On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:02:22AM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:59:11 +0100, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> > Essentially, there is *no* change in any of the numbers with and without
> > ptrace over utrace.
> 
> While it is probable so please rather check diff of the *.sum files as some of
> the results are fuzzy and - in a rare possibility - two results changing
> FAIL->PASS and PASS->FAIL will not show in this summary.

Jan,

The diff is as below:

--- vanilla-gdb.sum     2009-11-25 15:28:47.885380052 +0530
+++ pt-gdb.sum  2009-11-25 15:20:42.838419047 +0530
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Test Run By ananth on Wed Nov 25 15:22:46 2009
+Test Run By ananth on Wed Nov 25 14:17:54 2009
 Native configuration is powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
 
                === gdb tests ===
@@ -7602,7 +7602,7 @@ PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp at s
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp at segv; continue to keeper
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp at segv; nopass SIGSEGV
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp at segv; set breakpoint 0 of 1
-PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp at segv; stepi out of handler
+PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp at segv; stepi out of handler (at 
breakpoint)
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp at segv; clear breakpoint 0 of 1
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: rerun to main
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before and at segv; pass SIGSEGV
@@ -7610,7 +7610,7 @@ PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp befo
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before and at segv; nopass SIGSEGV
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before and at segv; set breakpoint 0 of 2
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before and at segv; set breakpoint 1 of 2
-PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before and at segv; stepi out of handler
+PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before and at segv; stepi out of handler 
(at breakpoint)
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before and at segv; clear breakpoint 0 of 2
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before and at segv; clear breakpoint 1 of 2
 PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: rerun to main

Ananth

Reply via email to