On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:54:28PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > (add cc's) > > On 12/03, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > > Not sure what should we do right now, s390 needs more attention. > > > Also, it uses PT_PTRACED bit, I am afraid this is not what we wan > > > with utrace. > > > > This looks simple. Its one use can just be > > tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(SIGTRAP) instead. I expect you can just > > send that change to the s390 maintainers and they will take it. > > Done. > > But... I tried to understand these check and failed. Why do we need them? > They look unneeded to me, but of course I know nothing about s390.
Could be. I tried to figure out when and why this was added. But looks like this is >10 year old code.
