Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> writes: > [...] > Right, so all that need be done is add the multiple probe stuff to UBP > and its a sane interface to use on its own, at which point I'd be > inclined to call that uprobes (UBP really is an crap name).
At one point ubp+uprobes were one piece. They were separated on the suspicion that lkml would like them that way. > Then we can ditch the whole utrace muck as I see no reason to want to > use that, whereas the ubp (given a sane name) looks interesting. Assuming you meant what you write, perhaps you misunderstand the layering relationship of these pieces. utrace underlies uprobes and other process manipulation functionality, present and future. - FChE
