* Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ana...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 08:39:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > When we merged kprobes ~10 years ago we made the (rather bad) mistake of
> > merging a raw, opaque facility and leaving 'the rest' up to some other
> > entity.
> > IBM kprobes hackers vanished the day the original kprobes code went
> > upstream
> > and the high level entity never truly materialized in-kernel, for nearly a
> > decade!
>
> I don't know what you are referring to here... Kprobes was merged in 2.6.9
> (~August 2004 -- less than 6 years ago). [...]
Ok, 6 years then :-)
> [...] Since then, we did work on ports to powerpc and s390. We implemented
> kretprobes. We made it much scalable using RCU; we did the powerpc booster
> to skip single-step when possible, not to mention various bug fixes over the
> years.
Except it had no real in-kernel user.
> Yes, we did not do the perf integration, but perf did not exist then,
> either.
>
> Its simply wrong to say people 'vanished'.
It has certainly was a bit stale for years - and with no real users that's
certainly not a surprise. That has changed recently so i'm not complaining. We
just dont want to repeat the same mistake with uprobes.
Ingo
