Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> writes: > [...] >> Therefore until you track some ugdb-specific software(*) >> breakpoints ugdb does not need to support Z0 IMO. I guess ugdb >> will never have to support these: thread-related(?) and tracepoint >> ones.
> Good! I thought ugdb should somehow handle this all "transparently" > for gdb. I thought (I don't know why) that writing "int 3" from gdb > side should be avoided in favour of some "better" method unknown to me. Please note that last year's gdbstub prototype used kernel uprobes as an optional gdb breakpoint implementation (i.e., a backend for the Z packets). When/if the lkml uprobes patches actually get merged, ugdb should also use them. - FChE
