> ugdb sets "please stop" flag and does utrace_control(INTERRUPT). However, > in unlikely case the tracee can stop before ->report_signal() reporting
I don't think this is the right thing to do. When the intent is explicitly to interrupt, there is no reason to stop before the interruption is complete, i.e. report_signal. If you only stop there, then you can always process a signal injection with complete flexibility. The gdb model and the remote protocol doesn't currently have any concept of requesting a stop that is not an interruption. Thanks, Roland