On 06/20, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > I don't really have an objection > to utrace per se, as it is low impact, just the idea of reverting a > bunch of inconvenient code to do it.
I understand. Once again, it was supposed to be a temporary solution until fedora switches to 3.1. And the reverted code does not make the real difference so far, the user-visible changes are minor. OK, I won't argue. So we need to rework utrace/ptrace in 3.0, then we should do this again in 3.1. I'll try to do something. Oleg.
