The articles page is the second-most visited page on the site with 961 (134 unique) hits since its inception less than a month ago. /Someone/ is viewing the articles. :) Just seems like very few of us are acutally /writing/ them.
By the way, last week, we reached 1,000 unique visits to the new site. That's since March of this year (4 months ago). Pretty cool! --Dave Ben Crowder wrote: >Just kidding, this e-mail isn't about Ogg Vorbis (although Ogg is >pretty darn cool, and I hope Art mentions it in his presentation on >Thursday). But everyone seems to be avoiding posts that have >"Articles" in the subject, so I figured this would bypass that. :) > >I don't want to sound like a nag, of course. But there are still >hardly any articles on the website. Which raises the question: is >anyone actually reading them? In fact, how many of you access the >website regularly? There are over 110 people on this list, which is >a good-sized knowledge pool. Each one of you has expertise in at >least one area, most likely several. If people are actually reading >the articles, then yes, feel guilty until it brings you to write an >article. :) But if nobody's reading the articles, then I guess it >doesn't really matter. :) > >Speaking of Ogg Vorbis, by the way, I tried encoding "May It Be" >(from the Lord of the Rings soundtrack) with different quality >levels (1, 3, and 10) and couldn't tell the difference between any >of them. Am I just deaf or is the difference something only >hardcore audiophiles can tell? :) > >Also, what do y'all think of Theora? (For those who don't know what >it is, see www.theora.org) > >Ben > > >
