Sun selling X86 is still a response to the market dominance of the X86.
That's also the reason they ported Solaris to the X86.  There is so much
competition in the X86 market, that thing are really cheap. It takes more
that a CPU to make a computer.  They may not be concerned about running
Windows app (for a time, I had an SGI X86 PC that did run windows) but there
are plenty of peripheral that run on the X86.  Your SCSI card or fancy new
video card use X86 bios code.  Plug one into the PCI bus of a sparc, and you
wont get far.  The PCI card bios can be redone, but that's expensive and you
will loose the advantages of commodity goods.  (if you make a lot of the
same thing, you can do it cheap)  Plus the PCI card vendors support costs go
way up.  Same goes for your support chips.  A VIA chipset is much cheaper
than anything you'll find for a sparc.  As for not selling cheap Linux/sparc
boxen, that's likely a marketing decision.  Sparc hardware isn't cheap and
the people who buy it know that.  If you by a sparc, it's likely because you
HAVE to have a sparc.  The additional cost of the Solaris OS isn't going to
stop you.  
  
  I'm just guessing, but support chipsets may be the reason the dragon in
using an Alpha core.  Way back when, Intel tried to muscle AMD out but
making the bus interface proprietary.  Before that, AMD made a dropin
replacement for an Intel CPU.  (same motherboard)  They were hoping that AMD
wouldn't be able to get anyone else to make a new chipset and motherboard
just to support a second tier company.  AMD's response was to adopt Digitals
Alpha interface.  I remember seeing AMD motherboards with Digital support
chip.  For a while, they promised us that we could use the same motherboard
with ether a AMD X86 or an Alpha simply by changing the bios chip. There are
many companies making support chips for the AMD now, maybe China is hoping
to use them on their new dragon Alpha.  The Alpha is a great architecture,
much better than X86.  If they can get their dragon running at a respectable
speed, and build a motherboard (using chipset built for the AMD) for a
reasonable price, I'd sure like to buy one. 

dave


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [uug] Industry standards processor


Why then is Sun, of all companies, selling cheap
Linux/x86 boxen instead of cheap Linux/Sparc boxen? 
Why isn't Sun fostering cheap imitations so that Sparc
will be the commodity chip?

Why is China's dragon processor based off of the
(AFAIK) non-free Alpha proc instead of the
freely-available Sparc standard?  They're not really
bound by these two x86 constraints.

-Jon D.

--- "Tucker, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Installed user base and backwards compatibility. 
> That's the only reason
> people put up with the arcane PC/X86 architecture. 
> Other industries that
> are not a bound by these concerns, often see the X86
> as overpriced,
> inefficient and power hungry.  You won't find many
> cable set-top boxes with
> an X86 processor.  (Just as you wont find may
> running a Micro$oft OS)
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [uug] Industry standards processor
> 
> 
> I just read this good article "Will the real chip
> standard please stand up?" [1]   
> In a nutshell it states that Intel would have
> everyone
> believe that x86 is /the/ industry standards chip,
> but
> the author argues that, while it's the pervasive
> commodity, it's quite proprietary.  He goes on to
> say
> that the Sparc architecture is a free standard
> according to IEEE (IEEE 1754-1994).  There are 32
> bit
> and 64 bit standards available.  My favorite line:
> "Theoretically, you could download any of the specs,
> build a chip, put it in a box, and sell it as a
> system
> without paying anyone a dime."
> 
> This begs the question, why aren't there more chip
> makers building off this excellent standard? 
> Any other thoughts in the uug about this topic?
> 
> -Jon D.
> 
> 
> [1]
>
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2911230,00.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> 
> ____________________
> BYU Unix Users Group 
> http://uug.byu.edu/ 
>
___________________________________________________________________
> List Info:
>
http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
> 
> ____________________
> BYU Unix Users Group 
> http://uug.byu.edu/ 
>
___________________________________________________________________
> List Info:
http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to