On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 21:45, Glen Wagley wrote: > So how much "work" did they do to GNOME 2.2 and KDE 3.1? Are they more like > the versions released by the creators or are the more of a RedHat version? > -Glen
I always have taken exception to the complaints about the supposed rebranding of KDE by RedHat. If there were changes made, they were for the sake of integration (why should I care whether the app is gnome or KDE) or usability. I don't use KDE, and I don't really like it, so I can't comment much on it. But I'm sure it's there and can be re-themed using keramik or whatever your flavor is. And it's hardly "broken" by redhat as so many have suggested. Gnome 2.2 is well on it's way. That's what I use. -- Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
