I agree. On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 10:06:02PM -0600, Stuart Jansen wrote: > On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 22:18, Glen Wagley wrote: > > Stuart, > > That has to be the best argument and analogy for top posting that I have > > ever read. I'll be sure to use it with my associates. I get so tired > > of scrolling, scrolling, scrolling, and more scrolling to get to a <10 > > word response. Thanks again! > > You missed the point. The problem is never editing. You wouldn't have to > scroll if the message were properly edited. Top posting encourages not > editing. Proper etiquette, or care for clarity, would encourage inline > commenting of the form > > <context> > > <response> > > <context> > > <response> > > <ad infinitum> > > On short messages, this becomes bottom posting. > > Top posting is BAD!!!!
> ____________________ > BYU Unix Users Group > http://uug.byu.edu/ > ___________________________________________________________________ > List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list -- ------------------------------------------- | --------------------- Michael Halcrow | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Developer, IBM Linux Technology Center | | I stole this Sig. | ------------------------------------------- | --------------------- GnuPG Keyprint: 05B5 08A8 713A 64C1 D35D 2371 2D3C FDDA 3EB6 601D
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
