On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 10:33, Devin Pratt wrote: > Are Firebird and Thunderbird just as stable and compatible with websites > as Mozilla is? If we want to make a good impression, give them the > best. They won't care how fast it loads or that it doesn't need to > install if it just plain doesn't work. However, I've only tried > Firebird and that was a while ago.
I almost agree with the vote to leave off mozilla and just stick on Firebird and Thunderbird. They are both extremely stable. The only show stopper would be that a lot of windows plugin installers don't know to look for firebird. Java 1.4.2 is one of them. Except for that small problem, firebird is the browser of choice. Michael > > Devin > > >>I vote to just have Firebird and Thunderbird and to leave off the > >>full Mozilla. > >> > >> > > > ____________________ > BYU Unix Users Group > http://uug.byu.edu/ > ___________________________________________________________________ > List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list -- Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
