> I agree, I don't see any reason for a copyright holder to be able to
> live off of one piece of copyrighted work for 20 years after he is dead.
> It just seems like a bit much to me.  I can't think of any other line of
> work that offers that kind of compensation.

Living off of something for 20 years after you're dead? So are you still
living ... or dead... ;-)

> Overall he makes some very good points in his article.  I hope he sent a
> copy to Orrin Hatch, and a few other lawmakers :)

I took the liberty of sending a link to the first story to Orrin Hatch's
office after I first read it. I'm sure some aide filtered it out and
that was the end of it.

-Brent


____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to