On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 15:58, Harshwardhan Nagaonkar wrote: > I just saw this thread on the debian-user mailing list. I was in favour > of mangling the reply-to header for mailing lists. After reading that > thread and this webpage, I am having different feelings. Is our list > munging the reply-to headers (I'm about 90% sure that it is) ? And > before another flame-war erupts, was this discussed and voted down > before?? I'm just hoping for some informative comments. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200310/msg06736.html > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Yes, it has been discussed. I read the essay and have to say that having experienced both, I prefer the status quo. -- Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED], AIM:StuartMJansen> Programming in Java feels like C without the sense of accomplishment.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
