On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 14:40, Matt W. wrote: > From: "Michael L Torrie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 12:07, Ryan Bowman wrote: > > > least now I've used vim and can say by experiance that emacs is WAY > > > better. > . . . > > at least now I can say I've done the LDS thing. And I now that I've done > > the LDS thing I can say by experience that Catholicism is WAY better. > > In case anyone missed the moral: > You may believe that emacs is "better" but you can't escape the fact that it > is inherently evil.
lol! I guess I did miss the point. I was going talk about how I hated even emacs after trying it out at first, but then after using it for a while I realized it was true, I mean, uh, a great editor, and you need to give something new more of a chance before you decide it's no good. But, since I guess that wasn't the point, I won't bother. Bryan ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
