On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 19:36, Erin S. wrote: > p.s. I would love to have a debate round on this.... :) i might > potentially be able to argue even SCO's position better than they > do..... :)
If you are capable of constructing a coherent thought, you will be able to argue SCO's position better than they do. That will not be challenging. -- Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED], AIM:StuartMJansen> "[I]ncoherence is one of the luxuries of impotence. Those who cannot, or will not, take responsibility themselves feel free to snipe at those who do." - The Economist, 8 Nov 2003, pg. 11
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
