I've gotten sick of the increased attacks against Free and open source software. Sparked by a recent article that compared Free software to communism, I wrote a rebuttal. I'd appreciate feedback, especially criticism and correction.
http://students.cs.byu.edu/~sjansen/comrade/ Do you feel that I present a fair and accurate portrayal? Is the document understandable to a person with limited experience with computers or the issues involved? I'm a little informal in places. Does this detract from the document? Do I miss any important points? What should be footnoted/linked? Where have I forgotten to give credit? Did I make any style mistakes? Feel free to answer any question I didn't ask but should have. -- Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED], AIM:StuartMJansen> "[I]ncoherence is one of the luxuries of impotence. Those who cannot, or will not, take responsibility themselves feel free to snipe at those who do." - The Economist, 8 Nov 2003, pg. 11
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
