On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 09:38, Evan McNabb wrote: > Actually, it was Frank and Elizabeth who did the most work. :-) Going to > the hearing was a lot of fun and I learned quite a bit. In a nutshell, I > feel much better about the case after hearing the IBM lawyers AND the > judge rail on SCO. SCO fumbled around and couldn't make a point or stay > on topic. I actually started feeling bad for SCO for a few minutes, > especially when David Marriott (an IBM lawyer) was speaking. That pity > quickly faded. I guess that's what happens in a hearing when you hire > your brother as a lawyer... :-)
It still seems unreal. I can't quite believe that I was there yesterday and SCO did so badly. Props to Frank and Elizabeth (she rocks). -- Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED], AIM:StuartMJansen> "[I]ncoherence is one of the luxuries of impotence. Those who cannot, or will not, take responsibility themselves feel free to snipe at those who do." - The Economist, 8 Nov 2003, pg. 11
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
