I know 40-bit WEP is pretty lousy, but what about 128 bit? Is it just as insecure? Well, it wouldn't surprise me...
Hopefully that new one they are talking about gets standardized pretty soon. I can't remember what it is called. On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:52:56AM -0700, Carl Youngblood wrote: > > > >Now you just need to figure out how to connect to an AP that used a > >password to calculate the WEP key. I don't know what kind of hashing > >algorithm or what linksys uses when you type in a password for your AP > >and it converts it into a key. > > > WEP is so insecure that, if you can at all avoid using it, you should. > It provides no additional security and just slows down your connection. > But I guess you would still want to connect to an AP that has this > turned on, even if it is a bad idea. > > Carl > ____________________ > BYU Unix Users Group > http://uug.byu.edu/ > ___________________________________________________________________ > List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list -- Phillip Hellewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
