-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bryan Murdock wrote:
| The only argument that defeats this is Michael's argument that we don't
| own knowledge, we just discover it, so why should we have control over
| it?

Ahem, in Michael's defense, he also mentioned that temporary copyright
exists to give a person temporary stewardship over that idea. This
concept of stewardship also applies in property (we within the Church
should recognize this). We don't "own" any of our physical property, it
is only a temporary stewardship we have from the Lord. Does that mean we
shouldn't have control over that stewardship? No -- we do have control,
because that's what a stewardship is. "Thou shalt not steal" is still
applicable even though my neighbor's Corvette is only "on loan" to him.

Anyways, don't try and read too much into this argument -- there are
already parts of it I'm starting to question myself -- but I want to get
it out as an extra angle. In general my opinions on copyright and DRM:

* Copyright is good, but only as a temporary mechanism. There must be
some point where a work enters the public domain and expands the
creative commons.

* Downloading music/movies/ebooks is bad iff the creator doesn't want it
distributed. In that sense, P2P applications are not bad, some creators
may choose/allow that as a distribution mechanism. But certain (indeed,
most) *uses* of P2P are bad.

* DRM is amoral (not immoral) in that it enforces something good
(copyright) at the expense of something else good (fair use). As such,
we will always be able to criticize/praise DRM if we look hard enough
while also ignoring hard enough.

* The DRM tradeoff may not be avoidable, and may be a sacrifice we
should accept. (Many laws inadvertently prohibit something which can be
good in order to promote a greater welfare, and we accept that.)

* All *existing* implementations of DRM I've seen are sufficiently
flawed to preclude their use.

Jacob Fugal

(p.s. I refuse to post to this thread beyond this, just because I don't
have the time)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAFwtL/PO7QochUiQRAq5kAKDALhGgCjQCuUfEZHvRlkjelt066gCdGoMZ
P+HwMUaQTk/jPE7IA5bDg8g=
=29Ww
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


____________________
BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to