On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 21:29, Jon D. wrote: > --- Von Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Really, though, the one with no votes didn't really > > campaign, so I think > > it's more that than the order they're in. > > > > Of course it's more than the order that they're in, as > I had mentioned. But can you provide an explanation > why the average of all the election positions in the > last slot is significantly lower than the person in > the first slot. Please tell. I would love to be > proven wrong.
That's easy (seriously): Thems who set up the poll knew who they thought were the best candidates and placed them first knowing that they would win. Or perhaps the candidates were placed in order of nomination, in which case the early nominations were made by people who felt sure that their candidate would do particularly well. ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
