So it really sounds to me like in-house code that is never distributed or published doesn't have to be GPL. You can modify it - and because you don't distribute or publish your modifications you don't have to license those modifications as GPL.
Seems kind of no-duh to me, if you don't distribute it, or in other words, if you don't license it to anyone, then licensing it under any sort of license just doesn't make sense....right?
I think the GPL just says, if you are going to give or sell (or in other words license) your changes to this code to anyone, it has to be licensed under the GPL.
Bryan
____________________
BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
