>On the contrary, I think they are quite clear, especially as the
>statistics are not from MacWorld but from mi2g.

actually, MacWorld is citing mi2g, and we are assuming the statistics are
accurately cited.

anyway, i agree, i think we can assume they are being fair.  oh, and tech
reporters are still notoriously inaccurate.

>It is not a lame excuse for Linux...

yes it is.  you can't blame linux security breaches on careless windows
admins.  if you do, then i guess you can also blame windows security
breaches on careless unix admins?  sorry.

>yes, successful attacks of linux are on the rise but Linux by design is
>not more vulnerable than Windows...

i don't think anyone is suggesting that linux by design is more vulnerable
than windows.  it just seems to be successfully breached more often.

>Many more Windows systems were compromised because of inherent design flaws
in
>Windows itself, as stated by Michael Torrie and seconded by most any
>other computer scientist and security researcher who is able to look
>objectively or somewhat objectively at the situation.

sorry, but this gets a big 'ol LOL from me.

i submit that windows fundamentally has a very excellent design, and the
security design is also very good.  though many of it's apps have security
problems.  you're going to have to show me a stack of papers from
"objective" computer scientists elaborating on the fundamental design flaws
in windows.  vms and mach are admirable models, and david cutler is an
extraordinary engineer.

>Now, as for techno-agnostic...I see several possiblities for what that
means:
>1) You do not believe that we can prove technology exists
>2) You believe that technology exists, but it does not care about you
>individually
>3) You doubt the truth of all technology

let me help you out:

1) I don't believe we can prove one technology is "right"/"good" and another
is "wrong"/"bad"
2) I believe that technology exists, but I don't care about it emotionally
3) I think all technology mostly sucks, but some technology sucks less than
others

you can also say i'm technology neutral, but since many people attach a
religious zeal to technology, i find the term techno-agnostic suits the
methaphor, wouldn't you say?

Josh Coates
http://www.jcoates.org


____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to