On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 14:05 -0700, Kenneth Burgener wrote: > I think he may have used the wrong word to describe his message. I > think of SPAM as a message used to profit the sender in someway. In > which way does a FREE tool used to improve keyboard efficiency > profitable? (Unless it has spyware, in which case he should be banished > to Hades!)
I would call it spam. It's unsolicited and in the wrong forum. There's a good chance that such an inappropriate decision was made by a bot, not a human. If that's the case, he deserves to rot in slightly more comfortable version of whatever tormet spammers will be consigned to. -- Stuart Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] aim:StuartMJansen http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? see also: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
