Hey, hey now. Pentium Pro was only in the last millennium! ;-) On 4/25/06, Bryan Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/24/06, Adam Findley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Richard Lyman wrote: > > > Am I really going to get that much of a performance boost from > > > switching over to a 686 based kernel, if I'm currently on a 386? > > > > > > Also, I've got extras like SHFS working on my current setup - won't I > > > have to go back through all of that setup to get it all working if I > > > switch? > > > > > > -Rich > > If you are going to switch to a 686, I also recommend ArchLinux. The > > entire distro is compiled for the 686 processor. Along with a bunch of > > great features, and KISS mentality, this distro might be worth looking > into. > > There are distributions that aren't all compiled for 686? Why? Are > there really a lot of people that don't have at least pentium pro > processors from like, 100 years ago? > > Bryan > > -------------------- > BYU Unix Users Group > http://uug.byu.edu/ > > The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their > author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. > ___________________________________________________________________ > List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list > -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/
The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
