On 6/27/06, Brent Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jared Bellows wrote:
> I prefer to use WeDAVS for such mappings. Using Novell's NetDrive
> application in Windows lets you mount it as a drive and in Linux you can
> use
> davfs. It's secure and works pretty well.
>
> Jared
I'm assuming that's WebDAV. How's the performance? One of the nice
things about NFS is how little overhead it uses. How well does WebDAV
handle being mapped by many client machines (performance- and
clobbering-wise)?
-Brent
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/
The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG.
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
It's WebDAV but using SSL so that it's secure. As far as users go, it
depends on the system. It's handled by the webserver since WebDAV is an
extension to HTTP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebDAV). We have it setup
for our department (Physics & Astronomy) with about 500 users. Granted, not
that many are accessing it that much at a time, but it's never been a
problem.
I've actually mounted the WedDAV "Share" on my computer at home (WyView) and
did an install from it. It went pretty well actually.
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/
The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG.
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list