Michael Torrie wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 17:17 -0600, Adam H. Peterson wrote: > >> I personally don't use Glade. That's nothintg against Glade; I just >> never learned it. I'm also a bit wary of using it because I believe >> it's GPL and I prefer LGPL for libraries. But if you don't have any >> problem with using the GPL, there's no reason not to try it out. >> > > The license on Glade itself is GPL, but that's irrelevant, since the XML > produced is not under any license. libglade, which is the part that > matters, is LGPL v2. > Well, there you have it, the result of someone doing their own quick research on libraries without looking into it completely. I thought you needed to link against Glade itself, and didn't realize there was also just a libglade under its own license.
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
