On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Richard Holden <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/9/2010 3:56 AM, Stuart Jansen wrote:
>>> It's amazing how slowly the legal system works.  By the way, how was it
>>> decided that this should be a jury trial instead of just a judge?
>>>
>> No idea. I stopped paying much attention years ago, until a few weeks
>> ago when I heard the jury trial was about to start at last.
>
> I've been following all along, basically it was decided by a judge, but
> SCO appealed and the appeals court decided that it should have been
> decided by a jury.
>
> Groklaw has the whole history if you want to read every minute detail.
>
> -Richard Holden

I'm pretty sure the whole 5 years issue is an example of how the legal
system doesn't work.

I'm not precisely sure how a jury trial is supposed to change the
facts of a simple licensing contract. This should be done and dead. .
. .


Of  course now Novell is on the block for $2 billion so we can go
through this all over again. Apparently Novell has $990 million in
cash and the company itself is worth less than that. Someone needs to
start a campaign to public domain any copyrights for System V and
such, and see if they still want to buy

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/12/elliott_denies_novell_asset_sale/
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 

The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author.  They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to