On 04/21/2010 07:11 PM, Wiseguyxp wrote:
> Do you know if anyone is working on a btrfs driver for Windows?  I've
> been playing around with FS configurations on my desktop and haven't
> found anything other than FAT/NTFS to be compatible and reliable
> enough for a shared drive/partition on a dual boot system.  Ext3/4 was
> giving me issues in Windows 7 and I finally just gave up, and the
> other FS's discussed here don't seem to have decent drivers for
> Windows 7 either.

Sadly, lack of FS support is one of the things you give up when you
choose to use Windows.

That said, I think that every file system should come in a fuse version
for testing and use in weird situations.  Having good Ext3 support, even
as a fuse filesystem, would be a godsend when using a Mac. MacFuse
already exists; wouldn't be too hard to tack any and all linux file
systems on it if they had fuse support.  But even trying to compile
linux file systems outside the kernel tree as modules is not easy.

I'd be more willing to test out btrfs if I could drop it in as a fuse
module instead of trying to compile one the backports or having to
compile an entirely new kernel.  Of course there are many things that
fuse can't provide a file system (other than speed), so I understand why
no one produces fuse version, other than ntfs-3g which works really well
as a fuse module.

--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 

The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author.  They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to