On Feb 4, 2011, at 10:54 AM, AJ ONeal wrote: > I thought that `make` was the simplest way to go. > Now that I'm compiling for both Linux and OS X I see that this isn't the case. > (Linux is the main target but testing on my MacBook is convenient, y'know) > > There's a hundred thousand make-like things out there: Autoconf, cmake, > qmake, scons, waf, rake, jake, etc.
I have used qmake for years with great success to build Windows, Mac, and Linux binaries. Works fatnastically well, even if you're not using Qt. However, because it is tightly coupled to Qt, I would first investigate cmake. I've heard good things about it, though I'm not sure how easy it is to build cross platform with it. --Dave -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
