Dnia sobota, 3 grudnia 2011 10:58:51 Roberto De Ioris pisze:
> > Dnia sobota, 3 grudnia 2011 10:29:18 Łukasz Mierzwa pisze:
> >> Dnia sobota, 3 grudnia 2011 08:22:10 Roberto De Ioris pisze:
> >> > Sleeping helped me a bit :)
> >> > 
> >> > I finally found the last leak in the master popping up during
> >> > socket
> >> > logging. My rant on socketpair/epoll was obviously wrong, they
> >> > helped
> >> > spotting the leak because their usage in uWSGI was wrong. Now the
> >> 
> >> master
> >> 
> >> > will make its health check at regular interval and not every time
> >> > is
> >> 
> >> is
> >> 
> >> > waken up by a event (like remote logging). This should push back
> >> 
> >> master
> >> 
> >> > cpu usage to low-values even on event storming and maintain the
> >> > memory
> >> > consumption at a static value. The whole thing has been tested
> >> > with
> >> 
> >> ksm
> >> 
> >> > too.
> >> > 
> >> > Let me know.
> >> 
> >> With uWSGI 1.0-dev-1745 if I have log-socket option enabled in vassal
> >> or
> >> fastrouter config, master cpu jumps from  0 to 100% on regular, small
> >> intervals and I don't get any messages on the log-socket destination
> >> other
> >> than: "received message: too fast"
> > 
> > Memory problem seems to be gone, after 400k requests per backend and 6
> > reloads
> > per worker, memory usage does not grow any longer, master memory usage
> > did not
> > grow since start. I'll leave it running for whole weekend.
> > This is without using log-socket option in workers, after it is fixed
> > I'll redo
> > the test.
> 
> should be fixed now

Yes, it works now, thanks. I've upgraded to 1746 and restarted test, I'll 
report back later.

Łukasz Mierzwa
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to