----- Oryginalna wiadomość ----- > Od: "Roberto De Ioris" <[email protected]> > Do: "uWSGI developers and users list" <[email protected]> > Wysłane: niedziela, 4 marzec 2012 17:20:21 > Temat: Re: [uWSGI] harakiri > > a bit "aggressive" :) > > > yes > > > this could mean the exit of a syscall or not a syscall at all: > > while True: > pass > > there is no syscall involved, but harakiri will come in. > > As a general rule i would not set harakiri <= socket_timeout. > > If nginx cannot send datas fast enough (on high-load it could > happens) it > would be better to gracefully close the connection using the normal > timeout and without killing a worker. >
I added: socket-timeout = 2 I increased nr of workerów in Nginx. I'll see if that resolves the problem. Thank you for your help. -- Łukasz Wróblewski http://www.nri.pl/ - Nowoczesne Rozwiązania Internetowe http://www.hostowisko.pl/ - Profesjonalny i tani hosting http://www.katalog-polskich-firm.pl/ - Najlepszy darmowy katalog firm _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
