El 6/9/07 9:50 AM, "Klaus D. Witzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Ralph, Edgar, is #4867 on your v3dot10 radar? Why I must have it in my list ? Not in http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5975 list Viewing Mantis, no test. 0004867: argument of ifNotNil: must be a 0-argument block, code does not match compiler inlining behavior But as you ask and I see Jerome said the method once was in Squeak (if I understood correctly), I going to put. By the way, when Ralph fires me for not follow rules, I knock your door and Jerome asking for a soupe :=) Edgard _______________________________________________ V3dot10 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
- Re: [V3dot10] testing packages Damien Cassou
- Re: [V3dot10] testing packages Damien Cassou
- Re: [V3dot10] testing packages Lukas Renggli
- Re: [V3dot10] testing packages Philippe Marschall
- Re: [V3dot10] testing packages Damien Cassou
- Re: [V3dot10] testing packages Ralph Johnson
- Re: [V3dot10] testing packages Keith Hodges
- [v3dot10] Re: testing packages Klaus D. Witzel
- [V3dot10] Re: [Newcompiler] Re: testing packages Klaus D. Witzel
- Re: [Newcompiler] Re: [v3dot10] Re: testing packag... Klaus D. Witzel
- Re: [Newcompiler] Re: [v3dot10] Re: testing pa... Edgar J. De Cleene
- [V3dot10] Re: [Newcompiler] testing packag... Klaus D. Witzel
- [V3dot10] Re: [Newcompiler] testing packag... Klaus D. Witzel
- Re: [V3dot10] Re: [Newcompiler] testin... Edgar J. De Cleene
- [V3dot10] Re: testing packages Lex Spoon
- Re: [V3dot10] Re: testing packages Edgar J. De Cleene
