http://codereview.chromium.org/141032/diff/1/2 File src/x64/assembler-x64.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/141032/diff/1/2#newcode1197 Line 1197: emit_rex_64(dst); On 2009/06/22 07:52:46, Lasse Reichstein wrote: > If REX.W isn't required, we might as well use emit_optional_rex_32(dst) It is misleading to the code reader to read rex_32 for an actual 64-bit move. Actually, REX without REX.W may be diffrerent than no REX at all. http://codereview.chromium.org/141032 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list v8-dev@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
