On 2014/07/16 09:29:57, vogelheim wrote:
lgtm

This does reduce boilerplate, but honestly I'm not sure whether it's really an improvement. This is way deep in 'bikeshed' territory, so please decide as you
see fit.


My concern is this: When you recently used one of these asserts, I spent quite
a
bit of time reading through the code review to figure out /how/ this actually
worked. But at least on the logic was plain C++, so I could work my way
through
it. I'm fairly certain that - in this newer version, with the macro soup and
all
- I would have had to spent a lot more time on figuring it out.

A related but minor point is that I'm certain tools (code searching,
refactoring, etc.) will have a hard time with this. (It's a minor point since
we
don't use a whole lot of those.)

Yeah I agree to this to a certain extend. Then again, V8 is already using this
sort of macro magic all over the place. I'll get a second opinion.

https://codereview.chromium.org/396923002/

--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to