Hi Soren Sorry for not replying earlier -- I was on vacation.
On 2009/09/30 09:19:15, Søren Gjesse wrote: > If you need some way of checking whether the VM is running you should add > a > command for that and not rely on a command like backtrace returning an > empty > response. Actually my plan was to rely on "running" field of backtrace response. I don't need "body" at all. I just wanted to be accurate and additionally block random-time stacktraces; I'm find with leaving them. I'm going to fix "running" field in responses by this CL. Currently "running" field is not accurate at all. Do you really thing I should introduce additional command instead of using "running"? > When connecting to the debugger agent the VM should never be in a > break state as all debugger events are ignored when no debugger is > connected. I propose we separate this statement from a previous one. Currently I'm working from assumption that VM may be found in a break state (there are some reasons for this). http://codereview.chromium.org/242034 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
