On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:30 AM Daniel Vogelheim <vogelh...@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:22 AM, <joc...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> compilers in general don't catch partial initialization of class... >> > > Well, no, but: They catch some intiialization errors; the built-in > initializer syntax makes it easy to initialize stuff; it makes it > easy/easier for reviewers to catch when an initialization is missing if > it's in the constructor; and it's at least possible to build tools to > support this. > yeah, fair enough - although in this case, we can't initialize the weakness type in the initializer list, because it's our fancy homemade bit field type :( -- -- v8-dev mailing list v8-dev@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to v8-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
