https://codereview.chromium.org/1213623020/diff/1/src/deoptimizer.cc
File src/deoptimizer.cc (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/1213623020/diff/1/src/deoptimizer.cc#newcode1235
src/deoptimizer.cc:1235: value =
reinterpret_cast<intptr_t>(isolate_->heap()->undefined_value());
On 2015/07/08 15:14:28, arv wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something here. Why is this set to undefined.
Shouldn't we use
the original constructor?
We do not yet support inlining of constructor calls where the callee
uses the new.target variable, so nobody will look at this field. Also,
even if we would support such inlining, this field would only be looked
at if the deoptimization actually happens in the prologue of the callee,
before the new.target variable is assigned.
But I am happy to leave a TODO behind in that regard if you feel we need
one.
https://codereview.chromium.org/1213623020/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
v8-dev@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to v8-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
