On 2015/07/30 15:50:39, rossberg wrote:
On 2015/07/30 15:34:58, adamk wrote:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/1250733005/diff/230001/src/macros.py
> File src/macros.py (right):
>
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/1250733005/diff/230001/src/macros.py#newcode101
> src/macros.py:101: macro IS_SIMD_VALUE(arg) =
(%_IsSimdValue(arg));
> On 2015/07/30 15:12:24, rossberg wrote:
> > I'm surprised this actually works! See above, you should have written
> > %IsSimdValue here.
>
> Drive-by explanation of why this works: since a recent refactor (by
Sven I
think
> it was), the "%_" form works for all runtime calls, and the backends
fall
back
> to the runtime if they don't have an implementation of a given
intrinsic.
Hm, was there a particular motivation for that change? Seems to make
intent
less
clear and accidents go unnoticed.
I'd be happy to implement the assembly intrinsic. Is there an example or
some
documentation for the extra work that needs to be done?
https://codereview.chromium.org/1250733005/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
v8-dev@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to v8-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.