On 2015/09/04 12:45:23, caitp wrote:
On 2015/09/04 12:34:32, caitp wrote:
> On 2015/09/02 21:11:14, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote:
> > Patchset 13 (id:??) landed as
> > https://crrev.com/510baeacbab311798d5e8795800ff773d00d062c
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30550}
>
> Based on a simple microbenchmark,
http://jsperf.com/v8-rest-parameters3/2,
this
> may have been more damaging to perf than I thought it would be :( This
surprises
> me a bit
Actually, I may have spoken too soon. I guess the xeon in my mac pro just
gets
through these tests slower than the i7 in my laptop. It still seems to be
slightly faster than the old implementation
http://jsperf.com/v8-rest-parameters3/3
Spoke too soon again, console.log was weighing heavier on the tests than I
thought :( http://jsperf.com/v8-rest-parameters2/4 so, the old
implementation
was faster :\ This is confusing since the desugaring is very similar to
babel's
implementation
https://codereview.chromium.org/1272673003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
v8-dev@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to v8-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
