Could you post a stack trace that leads to the FATAL()?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:27 PM Ben Noordhuis <i...@bnoordhuis.nl> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:11 PM,  <benjamin.pas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we (Microsoft VS Code team) are tracking down a very weird native crash
> in
> > our use of node.js (5.10.0, V8 46) that only ever shows up since we
> updated
> > from node.js 4.x (V8 45). It seems that changes (around the Garbace
> > Collector?) in V8 46 have an impact to the crash.
> >
> > Specifically, we are using the node-weak module
> > (https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-weak) to be able to get weak
> references
> > onto JavaScript objects. This used to work relatively good in node.js
> 4.x,
> > but with node.js 5.x we suddenly get the entire node.js program to
> terminate
> > with a fatal crash.
> >
> > Today we were finally able to track the location of where the crash
> > originates and it seems to happen when our application simply calls into
> a
> > property of the object that is weakly referenced. This call at one point
> > reaches the following assertion:
> >
> > void Object::VerifyApiCallResultType() {
> > #if DEBUG
> >   if (!(IsSmi() || IsString() || IsSymbol() || IsSpecObject() ||
> >         IsHeapNumber() || IsSimd128Value() || IsUndefined() || IsTrue()
> ||
> >         IsFalse() || IsNull())) {
> >     FATAL("API call returned invalid object");
> >   }
> > #endif  // DEBUG
> > }
> >
> >
> > The process terminates from the FATAL call, as none of the previous
> checks
> > in this method hold.
> >
> >
> > Now, the interesting question is: How would it be possible to have a JS
> > object where calling properties on it would fail in such a fatal way? It
> > seems to us that the object we are calling a property on is a pointer to
> a
> > location in memory where no V8 object exists anymore. It almost seems
> that
> > the object was garbage collected (or moved to another address?) without
> the
> > JS side (or more specifically the node-weak side) getting to know.
> >
> >
> > Since this only reproduces with using node-weak, it seems very likely
> that
> > there is an issue with either node-weak or NAN. In fact, node-weak is
> > calling into SetWeak()
> > (
> https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-weak/blob/master/src/weakref.cc#L174)
> > and relies on the fact that the callback passed in is triggered and maybe
> > this callback is not triggered anymore in a sync fashion but rather
> async?
> >
> >
> > I would appreciate some pointers if there is something that could have
> > probably changed in V8 46 that could have an impact on this.
>
> If you have a simple test case (stress on 'simple'), I'll have a look.
>
> --
> --
> v8-dev mailing list
> v8-dev@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "v8-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to v8-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
v8-dev mailing list
v8-dev@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to v8-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to