Revision: 4984
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue Jun 29 23:51:38 2010
Log: Update the mozilla tests to the newest version.
This includes an update to the test expectations, and a new bug found
when investigating the new failures introduced by the updated tests
(http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=762)
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/2838030
http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=4984
Modified:
/branches/bleeding_edge/test/mozilla/mozilla.status
=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/test/mozilla/mozilla.status Thu May 20 01:03:01
2010
+++ /branches/bleeding_edge/test/mozilla/mozilla.status Tue Jun 29 23:51:38
2010
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@
# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
# This file is up to date with respect to Mozilla's CVS repository as of
-# 2008-09-02. If new tests are added to Mozilla's CVS it may need to be
+# 2010-06-29. If new tests are added to Mozilla's CVS it may need to be
# updated.
# To get the mozilla tests:
# cd /path/to/checkout/test/mozilla
# rm -rf data
-# cvs -d :pserver:[email protected]:/cvsroot co -D
2008-09-02 mozilla/js/tests
+# cvs -d :pserver:[email protected]:/cvsroot co -D
2010-06-29 mozilla/js/tests
# mv mozilla/js/tests data
# rm -rf mozilla
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@
js1_5/Regress/regress-271716-n: SKIP
+# This test uses a unitialized variable. A Bug has been filed:
+# https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575575
+js1_5/Array/regress-465980-02: SKIP
+
# These tests are simply wrong (i.e., they do not test what they intend
# to test).
# In particular, these two compare numbers to NaN with != in the current
@@ -226,6 +230,10 @@
# toPrecision argument restricted to range 1..21 in JSC/V8
js1_5/Regress/regress-452346: FAIL_OK
+ecma_3/Number/15.7.4.7-1: FAIL_OK
+
+# toExponential argument restricted to range 0..20 in JSC/V8
+ecma_3/Number/15.7.4.6-1: FAIL_OK
# Array.prototype.slice with zero arguments return undefined in JSC/V8,
# empty array in Spider/TraceMonkey.
@@ -234,8 +242,9 @@
#:=== RegExp:===
# To be compatible with JSC we silently ignore flags that do not make
-# sense. This test expects us to throw exceptions.
+# sense. These tests expects us to throw exceptions.
ecma_3/RegExp/regress-57631: FAIL_OK
+ecma_3/RegExp/15.10.4.1-6: FAIL_OK
# PCRE doesn't allow subpattern nesting deeper than 200, this tests
# depth 500. JSC detects the case, and return null from the match,
@@ -315,6 +324,11 @@
js1_5/Regress/regress-320119: FAIL_OK
+# We do not recognize a multiline comment as newline character.
+# We are compatible with JSC.
+ecma_3/LexicalConventions/7.4-01: FAIL_OK
+
+
# No support for toSource().
js1_5/Regress/regress-248444: FAIL_OK
js1_5/Regress/regress-313967-01: FAIL_OK
@@ -347,6 +361,7 @@
# print strings for errors. Non-ECMA behavior.
js1_2/function/tostring-2: FAIL_OK
js1_2/Objects/toString-001: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/LexicalConventions/regress-469940: FAIL_OK
js1_5/Exceptions/regress-332472: FAIL_OK
js1_5/Regress/regress-173067: FAIL_OK
js1_5/Regress/regress-355556: FAIL_OK
@@ -386,11 +401,7 @@
# Tests that use uneval. Non-ECMA.
js1_5/GC/regress-418128: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-465276: FAIL_OK
-
-
-# Tests that use __count__. Non-ECMA.
-js1_5/extensions/regress-434837-01: FAIL_OK
-
+js1_5/Error/regress-465377: FAIL_OK
# Tests that use the watch method. Non-ECMA.
js1_5/extensions/regress-435345-01: FAIL_OK
@@ -432,6 +443,7 @@
js1_5/Object/regress-362872-02: FAIL_OK
js1_5/Regress/regress-361467: FAIL_OK
js1_5/Regress/regress-385393-06: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/Regress/regress-506567: FAIL_OK
# Use special Mozilla getter/setter syntax
@@ -484,6 +496,11 @@
# The concat() method is defined in Array.prototype; not Array.
js1_5/Array/regress-313153: FAIL_OK
+# The join() method is defined on Array.prototype; not Array.
+js1_5/Array/regress-474529: FAIL_OK
+
+# The lastIndexOf() method is defined on Array.prototype, not Array.
+ecma_3/Array/15.5.4.8-01: FAIL_OK
# Properties fileName, and lineNumber of Error instances are
# not supported. Mozilla specific extension.
@@ -552,6 +569,10 @@
js1_5/Regress/regress-417893: FAIL_OK
+# Unsupported use of "[]" as function parameter. We match JSC.
+js1_5/Regress/regress-416737-01: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/Regress/regress-416737-02: FAIL_OK
+
##################### FAILING TESTS #####################
@@ -596,6 +617,11 @@
# Marked as: Will not fix. V8 throws an acceptable RangeError.
js1_5/Expressions/regress-394673: FAIL
+
+# Bug 762: http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=762
+# We do not correctly handle assignments within "with"
+/ecma_3/Statements/12.10-01: FAIL
+
##################### MOZILLA EXTENSION TESTS #####################
ecma/extensions/15.1.2.1-1: FAIL_OK
@@ -674,6 +700,9 @@
js1_5/extensions/regress-367630: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-367923: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-368859: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/extensions/regress-369696-01: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/extensions/regress-369696-02: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/extensions/regress-369696-03: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-374589: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-375801: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-376052: FAIL_OK
@@ -693,6 +722,11 @@
js1_5/extensions/regress-420869-01: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-424257: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-424683-01: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/extensions/regress-429739: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/extensions/regress-454142: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/extensions/regress-465145: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/extensions/regress-469625: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/extensions/regress-472787: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-44009: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-50447-1: FAIL_OK
js1_5/extensions/regress-50447: FAIL_OK
@@ -771,7 +805,7 @@
js1_5/decompilation/regress-376564: PASS || FAIL
js1_5/decompilation/regress-383721: PASS || FAIL
js1_5/decompilation/regress-406555: PASS || FAIL
-
+js1_5/decompilation/regress-460870: PASS || FAIL
# These tests take an unreasonable amount of time so we skip them
# in fast mode.
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
