Added more tests, thanks for the feedback. See inline question about proxy
receivers for generators.
https://codereview.chromium.org/15288011/diff/19001/test/mjsunit/harmony/iteration-semantics.js
File test/mjsunit/harmony/iteration-semantics.js (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/15288011/diff/19001/test/mjsunit/harmony/iteration-semantics.js#newcode297
test/mjsunit/harmony/iteration-semantics.js:297: // Proxies and getters,
together at last.
On 2013/06/07 09:29:52, rossberg wrote:
Thanks. :) Sorry to pester, but can we also have a test where the
iterator is a
proxy?
Done. However it doesn't work for generators, as iter.next() ends up
being called with a proxy receiver, which fails as GeneratorNext() wants
a true generator receiver.
This is orthogonal to for-of, however. What should happen for proxy
receivers? Should GeneratorNext() unpack them?
Another (unrelated) thing that just occurred to me is testing the
behaviour of
'done' values that are not Booleans.
Added a couple tests. Not present == undefined was already being
checked FWIW.
https://codereview.chromium.org/15288011/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
v8-dev@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to v8-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
