Comment #3 on issue 3333 by [email protected]: Function name should
be configurable
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3333
Re #2: That comment referred to the effect described in issue 3334 for
example. The value of the 'name' property is actually stored in an internal
field (not as part of the JSFunction object but inside the
SharedFunctionInfo). We install an internal callback which appears as a
data property to JS, but internal in fact behaves very much like an
accessor. Using Object.defineProperty() to change the attributes of such a
value will bogusly turn it into a real data property, thereby destroying
this "shadowing" that the internal callback provided. This is a known bug
in Object.defineProperty() and will be fixed soon, but is unrelated to this
issue at hand.
Sorry for side-tracking the discussion with my PS comment.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.