On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Alex Iskander <[email protected]> wrote: ... > aspects of wrapping types dead simple (the last class I wrapped "just > worked"), but comes with a penalty of extra overhead (and thus reduced > performance) and extra complexity. That method probably not what you want > nor need.
i'd love to take a look at it. Got a link? :) -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
