hi! > I was not aware it was possible or supported to have an internal field > for a global object. Out of curiosity, what are you trying to do with > that functionality?
Well, I am just using it as a wrapper over my own global object which in turn, provides various functions, properties etc. If I wouldn't be able to have internal fields on the global object, I am curious how I could then simply have my own global object wrapped up? As I am using static accessors I wouldn't have any other way to get my global (c++) object instance besides using the same mechanism as on my other v8 wrappers.. Alex --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
