You can access the file with this url :

http://dev.nicdex.com/files/anonymous-method.cpp

Thanks,


On 14 sep, 08:06, Anton Muhin <[email protected]> wrote:
> As Matthias says, you haven't attached the repro.
>
> Judging from the stack trace only, are you sure you make a proper
> reference to you object and it doesn't get garbage collected?
>
> yours,
> anton.
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:18 AM, nicdex <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I think I've discovered a bug, but before submitting it I wanted to
> > ask, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
>
> > My settings :
>
> > v8: trunk (rev #5425)
> > compiler: mingw32 (gcc 4.4.0)
>
> > The problem :
>
> > When using a get accessor inside an anonymous function and the
> > receiver (this) is a C++ wrapped class (internal field pointing to the
> > c++ object), the AccessorInfo.This() gets corrupted and it crashes
> > when I try to access the internal field. It always crashes at the
> > third time.
>
> > Here is the gdb callstack :
>
> > #0 63E261A2     v8::internal::HeapObject::map_word(this=0xa045f01) (src//
> > objects-inl.h:1071)
> > #1 63E2605D     v8::internal::HeapObject::map(this=0xa045f01) (src//
> > objects-inl.h:1061)
> > #2 63E26081     v8::internal::HeapObject::Size(this=0xa045f01) (src//
> > objects-inl.h:1094)
> > #3 63E7AF6E
> > v8::internal::JSObject::GetInternalFieldCount(this=0xa045f01) (src//
> > objects-inl.h:1268)
> > #4 63C51964     v8::Object::CheckedGetInternalField(this=0x31abb4d,
> > index=0) (src\api.cc:3138)
> > #5 00420970     v8::Object::GetInternalField(this=0x31abb4d, index=0) (../
> > include/v8.h:3468)
> > #6 00425403
> > Scripting::BitmapGridWrapper::GridXGetter(property={<v8::Handle<v8::String>>
> > = {val_ = 0x603f814}, <No data fields>}, in...@0x603f82c) (C:\nicdex
> > \dexdo\DGE\src\scripting\cppbinding.cpp:127)
> > #7 00000000     0x0d3566bf in ??() (??:??)
> > #8 00000000     0x0603f814 in ??() (??:??)
> > #9 00000000     0x0603f82c in ??() (??:??)
> > #10 00000000    0x0603f83c in ??() (??:??)
> > #11 00000000    0x00000000 in ??() (??:??)
>
> > See attachment for a c++ test file reproducing the bug.
>
> > * Note that the callstack is from my original error, not the test, but
> > it is the same error, only the origin changes.
>
> > Thanks for your help.
>
> > NicDex
>
> > --
> > v8-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users

-- 
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users

Reply via email to