http://codereview.chromium.org/3595013/show sent for review.
yours, anton. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Anton Muhin <[email protected]> wrote: > Confirmed: the genuine v8 bug. Filing an issue against v8 and cc'ing > you Sebastian. > > yours, > anton. > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Anton Muhin <[email protected]> wrote: >> And thanks a lot for report, Sebastian. >> >> yours, >> anton. >> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Anton Muhin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> There is some nastiness in there---somehow hole propagates in for-in >>> loop. Let me have a quick look. >>> >>> yours, >>> anton. >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Sebastian Morawietz >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> This is actually from testcc/test-api.cc (Line 1782) >>>> >>>> v8::HandleScope scope; >>>> LocalContext context; >>>> Local<v8::Array> array = v8::Array::New(); >>>> CHECK_EQ(0, array->Length()); >>>> CHECK(array->Get(0)->IsUndefined()); >>>> CHECK(!array->Has(0)); >>>> CHECK(array->Get(100)->IsUndefined()); >>>> CHECK(!array->Has(100)); >>>> array->Set(2, v8_num(7)); >>>> CHECK_EQ(3, array->Length()); >>>> >>>> Here, the Array actually seems to be used in an autoresizing >>>> fashion....? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> v8-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users >>>> >>> >> > -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
