Abstractions for direct-style async programming will be expressible in
the EcmaScript 6 standard, coming to browsers near you in the next
couple of years.

/Andreas

On 25 January 2013 16:30, timp <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suppose this is off topic, but I'm not exactly sure where to post.  I
> figure it has about as much chance to be seen here by the right person as
> anywhere else.
>
>
> I would like to ask the gods of javascript to consider a new keyword, (if it
> is not there already).
>
> I would like to be able to do this in code:
>
> {
>  X = somefunction;
>
>  X.applyAsyncAndWait(X,args);
> }
>
>
> It could work many different ways.  I'm thinking the most powerful way would
> to be something like this:
>
> {
>   X = somefunction;
>
> __split_by_generating_closure_for_current_ip_then_generating_new_empty_stack_with_new_stack_frame_and_pushing_X_wth_args__(X,
> args);
> }
>
>
> If this existed it would *vastly* simplify code.  (at least the code I am
> writing)
> It would basically give us equivalent single threaded multi threading from
> 8088 days. Lol.
>
>
> All the callback, code segmentation things could go away.
> Clearer code.  less bugs.
>
>
> Anyway,
>
> I'm sorry that you must spend all of your days with this language.  I find
> it irksome, slow and forceful of fragmented programming.  Although I suppose
> you would say it is the future.
> Perhaps you are right.  I would be nice if javascript ran faster.  Things
> are so slow it is almost unbearable.
>
> Although I remember vaguely people saying the same thing about C++.   Some
> people still do. Lol.
>
> Why not consider as well introducing optional type keywords.  Hints to the
> compiler so that you can statically compile segments (and compile errors
> yay), maybe even reach performance of Java JIT, instead of V8 JIT, which is,
> despite all of the hype, about 100 times slower than Java JIT.
>
> -tim
>
> --
> --
> v8-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
>
>

-- 
-- 
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users


Reply via email to