Is it a requirement that all interceptor functions passed to
"NamedPropertyHandlerConfiguration" need to be static? Looking at couple of
examples, it looks pretty restrictive.
This is how I've designed my application around v8.
class Database {
public:
Database(Worker* w);
~Database();
...
...
static DB::Client* DB_conn_obj;
private:
bool InstallMaps(map<string, string>* bucket);
static Local<ObjectTemplate> MakeDBMapTemplate(Isolate* isolate);
static void DBGet(Local<Name> name,
const PropertyCallbackInfo<Value>& info);
static void DBSet(Local<Name> name, Local<Value> value,
const PropertyCallbackInfo<Value>& info);
static void DBDelete(Local<Name> name,
const PropertyCallbackInfo<Boolean>& info);
...
};
Interceptors functions like DBGet/DBSet/DBDelete need to use a DB::Client
connection handle and I had to make it static for things to work. But in
this model, I can't connect to multiple databases because each DB needs a
unique connection handle - so Ideally I would require non-static, object
specific connection handle.
Any suggestion on how to overcome this limitation?
--
Thanks,
Abhishek Singh
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
